Sony VPCF12M0E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCF12M0E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 85.9
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 122
59% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 230
26% 205 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 9067) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 211 207 208 212 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.4% Average
Read 221
Write 206
Mixed 200
SusWrite 208
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 15.7
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 153
121% 166 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
443GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 75 76 72 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 74.6
Write 72.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 73.5
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF12M0E Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF12M0E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback