Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 160 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 323 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 1.3 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 206 200 203 205 204 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.7% Above average	Read 214 Write 194 Mixed 197 SusWrite 205 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 15.3 92% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 18.2 26% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 93%
WL250GSA872 250GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 170GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 73 73 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 70.4 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 70.6 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.4% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.1 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	207x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $337

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16