MSI MS-1581

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF66 11UE
MotherboardMSI MS-1581  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 02:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 244
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 646
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6221
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 68.2
24% 42.7 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 61.3
74% 95.5 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1076 1085 1202 1362 1477 1413 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,459
Write 1,305
Mixed 1067
SusWrite 1,269
287% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 314
362% 628 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 223%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 15.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1581 Builds (Compare 4,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1581

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback