Asus P11C-M Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus P11C-M Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P11C-M Series
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9350KF-$180
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 277
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 521
63% 486 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.5% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 61.1
47% 62.5 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 54.1
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 396 418 409 409 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 360
Write 417
Mixed 325
SusWrite 387
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 33.1
121% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 184
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P11C-M Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P11C-M Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback