QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2160 x 1620 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 109
39% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 201
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
41GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 174 181 192 172 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 356
Write 302
Mixed 307
SusWrite 174
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 17.3
57% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 105
81% 112 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 231
Mixed 262
212% 282 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 17.3
2,938% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 105
994% 112 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 12.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback