Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '17 at 16:32
Run Duration	325 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 144 51% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 455 45% 366 Pts	64-Core 1,018 63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% EVGA(3842 2650) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.03% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 11.5 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 13 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 3TB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 114%
Adaptec Array 256GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 238GB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 84%
Adaptec Array 256GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 150GB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 84%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 243GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 461 Write 182 Mixed 242 65% 295 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 11.3 45% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 53.9 60% 102 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 145%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.99% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 5.91 Mixed 9.26 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.36 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 17% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.99% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-057.A00 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 29.4 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.2 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $349

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16