HP EliteBook 840 G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8549
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 148
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 318
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 8549) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.8
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 6.5
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 708
Write 481
Mixed 692
140% 627 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 45.4
140% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 43.9
35% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260KC78HAF-2666 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 12% 40 32 24 60 14" 1920 1080 AUO403D
History: Score 3: 0R 0G 3B | Score 5: 0R 0G 5B
Typical EliteBook 840 G6 Builds (Compare 2,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback