Intel H81

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Intel H81 (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '21 at 03:18
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 194 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 340 43% 328 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 60.5 52% 63 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 59.9 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 36 50 95 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 62.9 Write 60 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 56.1 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 69%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 49GB free Firmware: 0003BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 57.4 Write 42.7 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 52.6 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 24GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 86 Write 11.7 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 12.6 33% 33 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 106% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81 Builds (Compare 2,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H81

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	365x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	322x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	632x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	278x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	162x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	144x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	64x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	170x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	157x
2x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 3,862 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48