Lenovo 90LW00AUUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90LW00AUUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3714
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 710
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.84
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 88.7
81% 95.3 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 76.8
71% 88.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,147
Write 719
Mixed 1,042
284% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 74.8
248% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1006
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 1,075
777% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
115GB free
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 369 374 374 370 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 398
Mixed 297
SusWrite 377
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 39.5
151% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 163
172% 286 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 29.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90LW00AUUS Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90LW00AUUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback