HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EF
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 21:57
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 88.8
50% 75 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 130
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 81EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 62 79 69 61 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 284
Write 142
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 62
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.7
936% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 100%
Great: 160%
Seagate BACKUP+ 2TB
168GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 11 11 11 13 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 9.9
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 13.3
8% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback