Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 15:36
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,141
101% 856 Pts
64-Core 4,357
270% 4,357 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 198
Parallax 189
146% 189 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 186
Splatting 132
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 440 430 428 428 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,141
Write 1,382
Mixed 884
SusWrite 523
273% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 65.9
218% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,067
805% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 234%
Great: 363%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
475GB free
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1502 1509 1511 1512 1511 1512 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,022
SusWrite 1,509
315% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 64.7
226% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 628
518% 767 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 263%
Great: 262%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
946GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1383 1378 1380 1375 1392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,286
Write 1,380
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 1,381
337% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 69.1
234% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,494
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,234
944% 1,287 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 307%
Great: 363%
Toshiba HDWR160 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 149 155 151 157 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 148
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 154
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST6000VN0001-1SF17Z 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: AN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 51 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 25.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,703
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback