Multilaser UL150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMultilaser UL150  (all builds)
MotherboardMultilaser UL150
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 13:24
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 221
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 309
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 7.6
6% 6.23 fps
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPT256L2-2IAS7G2 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0901A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 329 134 160 208 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 1,004
Mixed 919
SusWrite 236
225% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 29.8
185% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 550
479% 716 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 181%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MS408GNSF-NA4F2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UL150 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Multilaser UL150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback