Fujitsu CELSIUS W580power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W580power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3617-A1
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 991
92% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,341
83% 1,341 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69% Good
Lighting 81.2
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 85
66% 85.7 fps
MRender 87.3
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 94.4
74% 90.3 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 573 587 607 598 607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,308
Write 1,916
Mixed 1,543
SusWrite 634
357% 1,600 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 72.1
236% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 972
733% 986 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 249%
Great: 296%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
289GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 888 592 592 591 592 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 1,865
Mixed 1,604
SusWrite 844
371% 1,661 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.9
249% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 1,029
778% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 269%
Great: 296%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
105GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 147
Write 72.9
Mixed 81.5
115% 100 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.1
199% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W580power Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W580power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback