Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 01:46
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 86.1
1-Core 217
2-Core 427
126% 243 Pts
4-Core 835
8-Core 1,648
147% 1,242 Pts
64-Core 2,967
184% 2,967 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 132
Parallax 165
70% 128 fps
Gravity 84.3
Splatting 127
97% 106 fps
Poor: 83% Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$363
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 485 486 487 482 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 486
Mixed 458
SusWrite 486
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 62.3
203% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 129%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
898GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 394 393 394 394 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 370
Write 392
Mixed 330
SusWrite 394
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 36.9
121% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 230
173% 231 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 124%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 226 224 224 227 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 175 173 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 108
SusWrite 174
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
294GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 81.9
Write 79.1
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 82.3
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4800C20-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 63.6
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 53.9
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 33.5
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 154%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback