Foxconn A7DA 3 series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn A7DA 3 series  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 22:51
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
Socket 941, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 93.4
41% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 182
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2631) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 1.5
4% 3.87 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 89 96 116 121 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 160
Write 155
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 110
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 165 165 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 149
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 166
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905403-442.A00LF PSD34G13332 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A7DA 3 series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A7DA 3 series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback