Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 104 49% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 178 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 150 46 54 54 61 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 173 Write 195 Mixed 138 SusWrite 87.1 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 4.2 33% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 94.3 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 31.9 34% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 56%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 14GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.9 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.47% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 22.4 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 7.8 19% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.47% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,060x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	300x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	161x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	153x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	77x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16