Daten DCM3A-4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDaten DCM3A-4  (all builds)
MotherboardDaten DAA4
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 68
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 712
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 A107) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.56
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 18.6
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 15.4
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI256MWR7 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0914A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 952 165 114 102 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 983
Mixed 726
SusWrite 395
196% 881 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 23.1
142% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 317
255% 355 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 139%
Great: 165%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DCM3A-4 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Daten DCM3A-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback