TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-WS/IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-WS/IPMI  (all builds)
Memory40.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 224
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 762
71% 592 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.7% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 49.9
41% 53.7 fps
MRender 49.1
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 57.9
44% 52.8 fps
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 41.7%
 Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM960HMJP-00005 960GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM5104Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 414 421 431 424 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 442
Mixed 382
SusWrite 421
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 235
186% 254 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 3x16GB
3 of 8 slots used
48GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 35.2
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 100%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99-WS/IPMI Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-WS/IPMI

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel  $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples21x
Core i7-5930KIntel  $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples12x
Core i7-6950XIntel  $449Bench 87%, 6,135 samples7x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples17x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples10x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples7x
SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples6x
SSDSC2KB480G8 480GBIntelBench 87%, 300 samples5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples5x
RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB 28GBSamsungBench 60%, 4 samples4x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 65%, 46 samples3x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback