LG 16Z90P-K.AA78A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLG 16Z90P-K.AA78A1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90P
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 166
2-Core 312
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 684
67% 551 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0400) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 28.9
23% 28.5 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 20
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TD9TNG-L2A0A 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1576 1251 1280 1283 1291 1258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1,965
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 1323
353% 1,555 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 63.2
245% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 931
750% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 259%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 44.5
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 17.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 16Z90P-K.AA78A1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: LG 16Z90P-K.AA78A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback