ECS B75H2-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS B75H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 494
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 05BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 85.9
46% 67.3 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 44.9
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 65 51 53 62 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 372
Write 326
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 100
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 0.8
43% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 23.5
21% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
676GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 148 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 149
Write 112
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 144
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B1G73EB0-CK0 029E CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75H2-M3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS B75H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback