PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | INTEL X99 |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20210115 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '21 at 17:43 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
EVGA(3842 2754) 2GB
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
|
3.9%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$33
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 60 40 33 30 55 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD1600 160GB
53GB free
Firmware: 16.N0G.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 65 65 65 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,024x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 959x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 908x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 488x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 482x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 460x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $84 |