Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 143 49% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 201 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PwrHis(1787 2287) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.4% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 9.9 9% 11 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 045C8820 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 3.4 35 0.2 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 213 Write 71 Mixed 98.3 SusWrite 17.1 22% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 7.5 46% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 4.3 DQ Write 0.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 8% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D33373842353237334448302D4348392020 2x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16