HP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO PC  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 18DD
Memory1.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 16:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2120-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 141
52% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 98
18% 124 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 18DD) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 86 78 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 70.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 83.3
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-063.A00LF 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 4.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 4300 AiO PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback