Pcchips A15G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPcchips A15G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS A15G
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 05:11
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9850
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.25 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 38.2
24% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 74
8-Core 70.5
10% 72.2 Pts
64-Core 71.3
4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Dell(1028 2B22) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 6
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BW180A3H 180GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCSi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 87 88 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 106
Write 83.4
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 85.8
21% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 16.1
54% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 27.9
23% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
451GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 120 125 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 114
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 123
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD Elpida EBE21UE8AFFA-8G-F 4GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips A15G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback