Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 04:17
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,037
97% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,459
90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 197
Parallax 184
143% 186 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 182
Splatting 128
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 433 431 395 395 388 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 449
Mixed 382
SusWrite 394
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 54.4
180% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 170
136% 191 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 126%
TRON: Legacy 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3 2.8 2.7 3 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.8
5% 4.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 5%
TRON: Legacy 8GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5 5 4.8 5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.9
7% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 34.2
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 37.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback