Lenovo 90Q800AEMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90Q800AEMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3715
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 00:42
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 986
89% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,381
85% 1,381 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
MSI(1462 3890) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 249
Parallax 282
225% 269 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 228
Splatting 171
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1406 1397 1726 1727 1723 1721 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 2,197
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 1,617
360% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 63.2
213% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,163
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 958
721% 973 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 255%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR Tigo LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 32GB
2133, 3200, 2133, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q800AEMW Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 90Q800AEMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback