Lenovo 20NE001MRT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20NE001MRT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NE001MRT
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 15:01
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 37.3
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 122
38% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 369
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.12.12
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 4.5
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8710B 512GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80020C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 470 455 480 482 457 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 540
Mixed 639
SusWrite 477
137% 613 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 41.2
131% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 367
278% 380 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 119%
Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
231GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 102 102 93 87 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 99.6
Mixed 75
SusWrite 92.3
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 79%
USB DISK 3.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.2 0.9 1 0.8 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 1
3% 2.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-006.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 216
19% 216 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback