Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Memory 41.3 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 81.5 33% 55.7 Pts	4-Core 89.9 8-Core 90.6 12% 90.2 Pts	64-Core 70.7 4% 70.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 8.2 7.9 9.1 65 152 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 267 Write 163 Mixed 195 SusWrite 41.1 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 10.2 38% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 55 60% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$100 1,047 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 699GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 8 8.2 6.9 61 108 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 105 Write 99.1 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 32.6 53% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991769 (996769) Hynix 3 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.7% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	8x
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	5x

RAM
991769 (996769) Hynix 3 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 22%, 3 samples	2x
F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 9 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905403-011.A02LF 6GBSamsungBench 25%, 7 samples	2x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $250

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16