TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel DP43TF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (4GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
SystemINTEL DP43TF
MotherboardIntel DP43TF  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20110112
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 09 '15 at 17:38
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium III Xeon processor
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 76.6
26% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
PwrHis(1787 2009) 1GB
Driver: ati2dvag.dll Ver. 6.14.10.7111
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 3.03
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.14%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
408GB free
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 89
Write 83.2
Mixed 50.8
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.28
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 49.5%
 Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
280GB free (System drive)
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 127
Write 126
Mixed 75.2
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.43
118% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 77%
Motorola XT912 32GB
1GB free, PID 4365
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.82% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 10.1
Mixed 14.1
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.76
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.93
83% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 9.82%
 Great: 10%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical DP43TF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP43TF

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel  $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples3x
Pentium Dual E2180Intel  $130Bench 33%, 7,312 samples2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel  $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples2x
GPU
GeForce 7300 SENvidiaBench 0%, 1,208 samples3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples2x
GTX 660Nvidia  $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples2x
SSD
335 Series 240GBIntel  $228Bench 77%, 4,220 samples1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples1x
SSDNow KC300 240GBKingston  $58Bench 78%, 2,054 samples1x
RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples5x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples3x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback