HP 750-427c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 750-427c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 188
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 564
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 113
Parallax 128
104% 123 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 87.1
85% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 960GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 225 147 196 216 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 172
Write 99.7
Mixed 311
SusWrite 201
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 28.9
116% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 192
171% 255 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-427c Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 750-427c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback