Medion P5395 2385

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMedion P5395 2385  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$133
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 182
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 307
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 313
21% 313 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.5
18% 20 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.6
18% 21.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 289 292 295 289 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 428
Mixed 378
SusWrite 303
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 53.4
176% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
520GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 120 114 118 121 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 121
Write 88.3
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 118
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 114%
Asmt 2115 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 113 113 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 75
Write 85.1
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 114
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 95%
SDXC Card 64GB
56GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 19 20 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 16
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 18.6
22% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.6
92% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 42%
WD My Book 25EE 12TB
6.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 79.1
Write 20.1
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 19.7
50% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 18.2" 1280 720 LCD0216
Typical P5395 2385 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P5395 2385

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback