Fujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3313-F1
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 12:53
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-222GC SOC R5E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 42.5
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 66.4
29% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 64.3
9% 66.4 Pts
64-Core 67.8
4% 67.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1202) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 118 129 124 127 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 433
Write 388
Mixed 294
SusWrite 132
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 28.8
93% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 32.1
26% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.7
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO A525-L Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO A525-L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback