Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD GX-222GC SOC R5E Graphics 22 User benchmarks, average bench 25% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 53.6 34% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 55.8 8-Core 64.4 8% 60.1 Pts	64-Core 66.1 4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5E Graphics 86 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 0123) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.1 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 3.12 2% 3.34 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43 436 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 91GB free (System drive), PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 175 215 214 216 216 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 290 Write 216 Mixed 197 SusWrite 203 296% 227 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 8.4 689% 9.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 9.6 766% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown i-DIMM 2x4GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16