Illegear ARTE 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIllegear ARTE 14  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 10:37
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 239
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 484
55% 429 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1D05 1105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 22.7
16% 22.2 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 15.6
16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1001 1072 1030 1040 1058 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 1076
Mixed 939
SusWrite 908
223% 989 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 71.4
244% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 834
591% 759 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 205%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 16.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ARTE 14 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Illegear ARTE 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback