Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$124 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 781 78% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,018 63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 37,718 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 142C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 9 Parallax 7.5 5% 7.53 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 10.4 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB 5,630 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 334 328 311 321 320 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 293 Write 300 Mixed 289 SusWrite 324 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 40.9 138% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 508 344% 419 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-3G2J1 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 12GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 9.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	481x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	168x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	162x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	228x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	140x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	76x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GBKingstonBench 57%, 278 samples	111x
AM2P32NC8W1-BCFS 1x8GBAdataBench 34%, 1,264 samples	99x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GBKingstonBench 61%, 1,808 samples	75x

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $124