Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 22:18
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 351
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 20.2
16% 18.5 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.3
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 402 399 408 412 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 394
Mixed 347
SusWrite 393
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 45.8
157% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 156
142% 209 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
302GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 74.7
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
203GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 83 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 94.9
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 82.4
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 121 120 122 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 101
Write 126
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 121
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 67%
Memorex Frog 8GB
7GB free, PID 053e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.7 4 3.4 3.5 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 11.6
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.3
12% 10 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback