Avell 1513 series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAvell 1513 series  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell GI5CN5E
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 201
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 649
69% 553 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9613
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 39.8
34% 41.1 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 25.7
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 274 264 263 265 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 339
Write 350
Mixed 226
SusWrite 271
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 33.1
122% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 199
174% 261 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 31 33 36 37 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 152
Write 70.4
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 40
94% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
121% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1513 series Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Avell 1513 series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback