Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Q304UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime13 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 239
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1480) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 112 138 102 95 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 331
Write 307
Mixed 202
SusWrite 106
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 5.6
34% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 18.6
22% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback