Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 693
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 131 103 99 142 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 441
Write 346
Mixed 129
SusWrite 104
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 16.7
53% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 20.3
DQ Mixed 42.1
37% 57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston SA400S37960G 1TB
884GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 44 42 36 36 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
Read 281
Write 13.2
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 45.8
20% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 12
60% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 28.5
27% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2J1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback