HP p6-2405et

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6-2405et  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 490
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 89
Parallax 77.4
76% 86.7 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 80
Splatting 71.5
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 49 59 49 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 247
Write 99.9
Mixed 130
SusWrite 52.5
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 12.9
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 106
90% 136 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
685GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 168 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 151
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 168
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2405et Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2405et

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback