Acer Swift SF315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Swift SF315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Erdinger_KL
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180928
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 09:29
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 179
43% 284 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1272) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 0.2
6% 3.57 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VSP 128GB QVE 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 29 14 38 14 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 321
Write 274
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 28.3
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 8.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF315-52 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback