ZET WARD H125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemZET WARD H125  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 00:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 770
72% 598 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 138
Parallax 109
82% 116 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 83.9
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 115 81 81 78 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 454
Write 148
Mixed 316
SusWrite 129
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 31.7
133% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 185
161% 236 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 26.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WARD H125 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: ZET WARD H125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback