Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200803
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '21 at 17:11
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 226 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 380 51% 379 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.9% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 46.3 28% 39.6 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 26.2 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 134 138 118 143 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 1,274 Write 821 Mixed 627 SusWrite 180 160% 726 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 11.8 76% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 645 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 114 164% 317 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 200%
Galax GXKA1C0512A 512GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 207GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 372 122 156 159 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 404 Write 400 Mixed 280 SusWrite 225 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 27.3 97% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 188 178% 277 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 249GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 115 119 119 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 141 Write 145 Mixed 89.6 SusWrite 118 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 101GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 69 71 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 69.1 Write 72.2 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 70.1 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 60%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 172GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 62 62 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 57.9 Write 59.4 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 61 43% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 59%
Jmicron Generic 500GB 2,959 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 192GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 87 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 77.4 Write 81.9 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 87.3 51% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 63%
SABRENT 1TB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 389GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 84 84 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 77.4 Write 79.3 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 82.5 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 87%
USB Flash Disk 129GB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 75GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 6.6 7.7 4.1 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 22.5 Mixed 4 SusWrite 5.5 17% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 59%
Generic External 80GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 74GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 20.5 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 18.9 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
USB3.0 Super Speed 500GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 247GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 37.8 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 18.9 40% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 158%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 39.3 MC Mixed 36.1 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 26 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	820x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	785x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	749x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	774x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	449x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	415x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	349x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	197x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $412

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16