Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 169 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 356 40% 313 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M 5,864 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.14.1163 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 18.2 17% 18.4 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 15.1 15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax GXKA1C0512A 512GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 199 107 150 13 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 442 Write 393 Mixed 311 SusWrite 143 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 29.7 109% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 175 165% 258 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 97%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 116 124 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 92.5 Write 139 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 123 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CPB 3x8GB 3 of 4 slots used 24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16