ARLT Mr. Gamer HD5770 X4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemARLT Mr. Gamer HD5770 X4  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 770-C45 (MS-7599)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 103
52% 80 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 209
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 132 132 119 118 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 227
Write 180
Mixed 178
SusWrite 130
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 9.5
43% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 34.4
43% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 55%
Samsung SP0802N 80GB-$40
32GB free
Firmware: TK200-04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 48 47 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 46
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 48
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFE85F-C8KM9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mr. Gamer HD5770 X4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: ARLT Mr. Gamer HD5770 X4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback