PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C89 |
Motherboard | MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20211105 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '21 at 01:21 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 82% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WPB1 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 115 19 29 16 51 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
992GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 190 197 194 192 195 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
90GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 118 116 124 122 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
811GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 143 149 151 150 151 MB/s
|
96.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
62.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,178x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 779x |
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 332x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 310x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 236x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 231x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $282 |