MSI B150M PRO-VDH D3 (MS-7982)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7982
MotherboardMSI B150M PRO-VDH D3 (MS-7982)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 260
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 694
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 132
Parallax 93.6
82% 109 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 79.3
72% 89.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 393 399 396 395 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 452
Mixed 362
SusWrite 390
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 45.4
173% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 268
224% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
10GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 400
Mixed 227
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 38.2
133% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 112
114% 192 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
890GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 199 200 189 199 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 113
Write 158
Mixed 77
SusWrite 197
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
521GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 172 171 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 165
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 171
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60% Good
Read 122
Write 110
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 118
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.8
214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 89 89 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 83
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 88.5
110% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
216% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M PRO-VDH D3 (MS-7982) Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B150M PRO-VDH D3 (MS-7982)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback