HP EliteBook 745 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807E
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 73
39% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 130
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 807E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ls600 256G 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 612 316 153 376 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 910
Mixed 892
SusWrite 370
203% 913 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 34.9
155% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 78.2
117% 224 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 141%
Great: 196%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
441GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 102 101 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.7
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 101
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 - [0xAE08] 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G3 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback