TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook 745 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807E
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 02:43
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 57
2-Core 87.8
41% 66 Pts
4-Core 96
8-Core 138
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 35.3%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 807E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.27 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 4.41%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ls600 256G 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0629A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 217 587 584 58 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,023
Write 626
Mixed 757
SusWrite 323
152% 682 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 18.5
112% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 78
124% 239 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 196%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
444GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 105 103 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 66.9
Write 83.8
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 104
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 58%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB
22GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 33 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27
Write 27.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 32.1
37% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 16.6%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 - [0xAE08] 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.6% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 15
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 33.6%
 Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EliteBook 745 G3 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G3

CPU
PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 1,599 samples118x
PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 33%, 827 samples26x
PRO A12-8800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 312 samples19x
GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,720 samples124x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples20x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 188 samples13x
SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples11x
MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 71%, 1,750 samples10x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples8x
RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples20x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples16x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GBMicronBench 25%, 2,370 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback