AZOM EXIGO V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	AZOM EXIGO V2 (all builds)
Motherboard	AZOM EXIGO V2 powered by premamod.com
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 211 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 495 49% 402 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7506) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.5% Very good	Lighting 86.7 Reflection 117 Parallax 89.8 71% 97.9 fps	MRender 90.7 Gravity 85.3 Splatting 99.5 76% 91.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,892 Write 6,301 Mixed 6528 1,468% 6,574 MB/s	4K Read 534 4K Write 317 4K Mixed 186 1,215% 346 MB/s	DQ Read 1,400 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 1,018 798% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 328GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 78 80 82 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 85 Write 92 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 76.2 52% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.4% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.8 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 20.9 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXIGO V2 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

System: AZOM EXIGO V2

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	6x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	3x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	7x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GBSamsungBench 180%, 2,105 samples	1x

RAM
F4-2400C16-8GRS 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBKingstonBench 80%, 5,417 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $267

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16